Why Everything Feels Like a Disconnected Dots

Feb 22, 2025

YES. THESE ARE ALL REAL PICTURES AND IT IS EXACTLY WHAT IT LOOKS LIKE

If your political party does not throw people off the stage for doing nazi salutes,
congratulations, you party is the NAZI party.

REQUIRED VIEWING:

THE SHORT VERSION: The Thiel-Yarvin Playbook: Understanding the Endgame
THE LONG VERSION: The CEO-Dictator Playbook

Understanding these events requires recognizing them as part of a deliberate, step-by-step strategy for authoritarian consolidation—not isolated incidents. Without the context of Curtis Yarvin, Peter Thiel, and the Neoreactionary (NRx) movement, these shifts appear scattered—each event carrying its own confusing anomalies. A sudden purge of JAG officers, the use of corporate power to extort foreign allies, the slow financial strangulation of academia—without a unifying framework, even experts struggle to explain why these things are happening in tandem. But they are not random. They are part of a blueprint that has been in the making for decades.

This analysis outlines how Yarvin and Thiel’s long-term project to dismantle democracy and consolidate executive power under corporate-aligned rule is unfolding step by step. The Trump faction is systematically reshaping the federal government, bypassing legal and constitutional constraints, and ensuring that institutional resistance is neutralized before it can organize an effective response.

POWER GRABS

JAG Firings Are the Next Step in Yarvin's Plan

The mass purge of Judge Advocate General (JAG) officers is a direct move to eliminate legal oversight of the military. This is definitely about DEI. However, that is now the distraction. While the public and some news agencies are spending thousands of words discussing ideological purges, the real objective is the removal of internal legal resistance to authoritarian power. This a split offensive. Most orgs will have to choose which angle to cover and push and how to effectively market their content in a legible way. But the Yarvin Step 5 angle is bigger than the DEI angle in my opinion.

JAG officers enforce military law. They ensure that the armed forces operate within constitutional constraints. Their removal is a calculated step to ensure that when the executive needs the military to act beyond the law, there will be no internal checks to stop it.

Step 5: Centralizing Military Control

The authoritarian movement in the U.S. is following Curtis Yarvin’s plan, step by step. The JAG purge is Step 5: Centralizing police and military power under the executive.

This clears the way for:

• Step 6: Shutting down media and academia – Control of information and education to prevent organized resistance

• Step 7: Turning out loyalist paramilitary forces – Street enforcement of new "laws"

• Step 8: Endgame – Technofascism and corporate rule – AI surveillance, controlled "network cities," total authoritarian control

This Is the Plan.

This is not improvisation. This is not reactionary politics. This is an organized seizure of power. The removal of JAG officers is a precondition for the illegal use of military force. (Source: On Democracy)

Musk and Trump Are Extorting Ukraine

The U.S. government is using Starlink access as a weapon to extort Ukraine. The demand is; surrender vital national assets to American corporate interests or be cut off from battlefield communications. This is mobster extortion with super power military consequences.

The administration is leveraging Ukraine’s reliance on Starlink to force an unethical and boldly lecherous and craven trade. Ukraine must give U.S. corporations control over key mineral resources or lose access to the communications system that keeps its military operational. This is not a negotiation. Ukraine is being given an ultimatum between economic subjugation or military collapse.

Elon Musk controls the single most important satellite communications system in the war. He has already cut access during a major counteroffensive, directly interfering with military operations. Now, his business empire is aligned with U.S. foreign policy objectives, which has recently shifted defiantly into a pro-Russia propaganda machine. His financial interests are embedded in government contracts, defense technology, and AI development. He is functioning as an unaccountable, unelected power broker.

The Trump faction is running foreign policy as organized crime. State power is used to enrich allies and punish enemies. Loyalist oligarchs gain access to national resources. Allies who resist are pressured, threatened, or abandoned. Public institutions are replaced with private power structures. This is the plan. They are just doing the plan.

Musk’s control over Starlink is a test case for a future where private megacorporations enforce the will of an authoritarian state. Ukraine is being shown what happens when the executive hands military-critical infrastructure to a corporate loyalist. The same model will apply elsewhere. Yes, even your state or town. Communications, infrastructure, and law enforcement will be privatized under those aligned with the regime.

Ukraine must submit or collapse. The same demand will be made of any opposition to the corporate-authoritarian alliance consolidating power, foreign or domestic.

The Third Term Project: The End of Elections

Curtis Yarvin’s plan is moving forward without pause or contest. The JAG purge removes legal restraints on the military. The Ukraine extortion locks in corporate enforcement. Now, the Third Term Project makes it official: permanent rule.

At CPAC, after a night of open fascist salutes, they unveiled the Third Term Project with the slogan: "For Trump in 2028 and beyond." This is not branding. This is not posturing. This is not ironic. This is not [insert some other coping mechanism to convince yourself that this is not exactly what it looks like]. This is the announcement of intent.

While the rest of this is moving along according to plan. Future elections are not part of that plan. The current coup has followed Curtis Yarvin’s framework step by step; breaking down institutional resistance one piece at a time. The military is being reshaped. The courts are being overridden. The economy is being restructured to serve corporate loyalists. The next step is taking direct control over the flow of information. Media and academia are already being targeted.

The project is past the point of persuasion. They are moving to enforcement. The street-level forces that will carry out the new “laws” that are already forming. The legal system is being bent to absorb this shift. The goal is not a third term. The goal is removing any conditions where elections can change power.

They are telling you who they are and what they are going to do. They do not intend to stop.

Curtis Yarvin

Universities Are the Next Target—And It’s No Mystery

While researching other topics, I came across a post by Mona Paulson, an assistant professor of law at LSE, on Bluesky. She flagged something strange in the White House Memorandum on the America First Investment Policy—a reference to university endowments and higher education funding buried in a document about trade protectionism and protection from foreign adversaries. Without context, it looks like a bureaucratic oddity. It isn’t. This is Step 6: dismantling academia.

If you exclude Curtis Yarvin, Peter Thiel, and the Neoreactionary (NRx) movement from the conversation, these decisions appear scattered. Policy shifts seem erratic, and even experts in the field following the changes struggle to explain why they are happening. But this isn’t mysterious. This is Step 6 of the Butterfly Revolution: dismantling academia and independent media. Their inclusion in this report has nothing to with protecting America. It’s about eliminating institutions that produce opposition before they become a problem.

The memo states that "university endowments will be reviewed to ensure compliance with the principles of the America First Investment Policy, including measures to protect against foreign influence and ensure alignment with national priorities." I can only assume that this is not standard economic policy language as it had a very smart and knowledgeable woman at one of the top law schools in the world scratching her head. It sets the stage for direct state intervention, tying universities to national security threats. Academia is being positioned as an enemy of the state.

The financial attack is already in motion. The Trump administration froze federal research funding. The University of Pittsburgh paused Ph.D. admissions, citing "uncertainty around research funding." The University of Louisville announced a hiring freeze due to "new executive orders and federal funding policies." Graduate student and postdoc acceptances are stalled nationwide. This is not budget control. This is cutting off academia’s ability to function in preparation for a full frontal assault.

This is same tactic being used against USAID, federal research programs, and other agencies targeted for elimination. First, cut the funding. Then, delegitimize the institution. Finally, replace leadership with loyalists and/or let it collapse. JAGs were purged in a single move because they held direct legal power over military operations. Academia, USAID, and other federal agencies are being dismantled in stages—first by cutting off their ability to function, then by branding them corrupt, and finally by replacing them with structures that serve the regime’s goals.

Paulson flagged this because, on its own, it made no sense in a trade policy memo. That confusion isn’t a failure of analysis—it’s a direct result of ignoring Curtis Yarvin and the Neoreactionary (NRx) framework. Even if Yarvin himself isn’t the sole architect, his blueprint is being followed step by step. Without that context, every move seems disconnected, every escalation looks like reactionary chaos instead of a deliberate plan. The JAG purge wasn’t just about personnel—it was about removing legal restraints on military power. The Ukraine extortion wasn’t just corruption—it was about fusing corporate and state control. The Third Term Project isn’t just political theater—it’s a declaration that elections are no longer part of the system. The assault on academia is the next step. If you refuse to talk about Yarvin and NRx, you will always be playing catch-up, watching the pattern unfold without seeing the structure that holds it together.

Prediction: They'll Pretend to Listen – Then Ignore the Law

I don’t want to get deep into the weeds on court rulings. It feels like an engineered distraction. They have stated, plainly, that the plan is to ignore the judiciary. By the time anything catches up to them—whether through delays, contempt rulings, or some last-minute judicial pushback—it won’t matter. They will have already moved too far forward. The news cycle is already full of reports about court orders they are “getting around” or outright ignoring.

But this particular Supreme Court decision (Source: WCPO) caught my attention for specific reasons.

First, it appears to directly affect someone(s) I occasionally interact with online—an alt-gov account at the USDA.

Second, next week, they may be able to provide real, on-the-ground feedback on whether the court’s temporary restraining order (TRO) has had any tangible effect—whether funding gets restored, whether hiring resumes, whether federal employees on the ground can actually enforce the ruling in practice.

The legal and media environment is completely inscrutable to me right now. Trying to follow these cases is pointless given my limited knowledge and skill set in this area—how would we even know if anyone is complying? The only legal stories breaking through are about how they’re ignoring rulings and finding workarounds.

Additionally, there’s also a couple of actual lawyers among my followers who have been willing to jump in and clarify some legal mechanics for non-lawyers like me. So this is an opportunity to test the theory myself—to see if there is even a sliver of real enforcement behind these rulings, or if my prediction holds: they’ll pretend to listen, stall for time, and then keep doing whatever they want.

Suppression, Surveillance & Civil Rights

Even The Carter Library is not Safe

The Jimmy Carter Presidential Library and Museum has canceled a series of book events, all centered on civil rights, climate change, and homelessness. Every event that was shut down fit the same pattern—topics that directly challenge the priorities of the current regime. No explanation was given. The authors were simply informed that their events would no longer take place.

This is how it’s going to be now. The Carter Library, of all places, is no longer a neutral space. Events that engage with political reality, no matter how mainstream or historically grounded, will be quietly removed. It won’t come with a formal policy shift or a public announcement. It will just keep happening.

This doesn’t stop with book events. It doesn’t stop with libraries. Once these spaces are closed off, they don’t reopen. The past is being erased in real time. The only choice left is to get used to it or speak out. (Source: Atlanta Journal-Constitution)

Final Thoughts

These actions are not reactionary moves but calculated efforts to centralize power, dismantle checks and balances, and shift governance into private hands. Yarvin and Thiel’s vision—an unaccountable, CEO-style presidency with minimal oversight IS THE BLUEPRINT. If you want to know what the house will look like, check the plans! Today’s developments show how the administration is not only dismantling legal and institutional resistance but also shifting public discourse to normalize extreme authoritarian measures. By introducing once-unthinkable ideas—such as removing military legal oversight, pressuring allied nations through corporate control, and outright rejecting electoral legitimacy—they expand the Overton Window, making authoritarianism seem not only possible but inevitable. This desensitization process is a key step in Yarvin and Thiels ultimate goal of dismantling democratic norms and ensuring that opposition structures collapse before they can effectively resist.

Seen through the lens of Yarvin’s strategy, these events are not separate crises, but coordinated phases of the same overarching plan. Without that context, it’s easy to mistake them for bureaucratic oddities, policy contradictions, or simply erratic governance. But step by step, the structure is being built. And it may in fact be gallows.